Quality Audit

A full picture of your
software quality

A comprehensive on-site assessment for mid-to-large organizations. Our engineers spend five days embedded in your organization, interviewing stakeholders, reviewing documentation and architecture, and examining your full development lifecycle, then deliver a written report and stakeholder presentation with prioritized findings.

What the audit covers

  • Vision, strategy & roadmap
  • Architecture & external / internal interfaces
  • Full testing strategy — all test levels
  • SDLC, quality gates & release process
  • CI/CD pipeline & deployment safety
  • Security & compliance posture
  • Tooling & infrastructure
  • Organisational structure & team composition
  • Historical issues & incident patterns
Stakeholder
10+
Roles interviewed
Output
Full
Report + appendices
WHO IS IT FOR

For organisations where quality has become a strategic question

This audit is designed for mid-to-large organizations where quality problems have outgrown individual fixes — and where leadership needs a rigorous, independent assessment to understand the full picture before making structural or investment decisions. It's particularly well-suited to organizations in regulated industries – finance, medtech, pharma, insurance, and enterprise SaaS — where the stakes of quality failure extend beyond UX to compliance, risk, and liability.

CTOs & VP Engineering
Product owners & Managers
Compliance & procurement
Leaders after M&A or restructuring
What we cover

A full assessment across every dimension of quality

We don't just look at your test suite. We assess the full system, strategy, architecture, process, people, and tooling, and connect every finding to a business outcome.

Vision & Strategy

  • Product vision and roadmap clarity
  • Short-term priorities and risk awareness
  • Quality culture and ownership
  • Hiring plans and capability gaps

Architecture & interfaces

  • Component and service structure
  • Data flow and critical transaction paths
  • External integrations and SLA assumptions
  • Internal interface contracts

Testing Strategy

  • All test levels — unit through E2E
  • Test environment and data management
  • Automation coverage and strategy
  • Exploratory and non-functional testing

SDLC & Quality gates

  • Requirements sources and validation
  • Code review and definition of done
  • Release readiness criteria
  • Historical defect and incident patterns

CI/CD & Deployment

  • Pipeline structure and safety checks
  • Deployment frequency and rollback capability
  • Feature flag and canary release usage
  • Build reproducibility

Organisation & Tooling

  • Team roles, responsibilities and gaps
  • Collaboration between dev, test, product & UX
  • Tool stack assessment
  • Incident response and post-mortem process
How it works

Structured. Thorough.
Delivered in five days.

The engagement follows a tested structure, broad discovery first, technical deep-dive second, synthesis and recommendations third. Every stakeholder is heard. Every finding is evidence-based. We request access to key documents before arriving, roadmaps, architecture diagrams, test strategies, CI/CD tools, and code repositories,  so we spend on-site time in conversation and investigation, not administration.

Start with a discovery call
1
Before Engagement
Discovery call & document request
We align on scope and timeline, and send a document checklist: roadmap, architecture docs, test strategy, CI/CD access, code repository, and a list of stakeholders to interview.


2
Before Engagement
Proposal & confirmation
We formalise the engagement scope, confirm the interview schedule, and agree on deliverables.
3
Day 1
Broad discovery & initial interviews
High-level stakeholder interviews — founders, CTOs, product owners, tech leads. Product vision, roadmap, quality culture, and risk appetite. Document and architecture review begins.
4
DAY 2
Technical deep-dive
In-depth interviews with developers, testers, DevOps, and security. Systematic review of architecture, test strategy, CI/CD pipeline, and tooling. Codebase walkthrough where relevant.

5
DAY 3
Synthesis & initial report draft
Consolidating findings from Days 1 and 2. Short follow-up interviews where gaps remain. First draft of the written report begins — findings, risks, and strengths identified.
5
DAY 4
Recommendations & report completion
Consolidating all findings into the report. Quick wins, medium-term improvements, and long-term roadmap drafted. Prioritisation based on business impact and implementation effort.
4
DAY 5
Final report & stakeholder presentation
Report polished and delivered. All findings presented to the full stakeholder group — leadership, engineering, product. Everyone leaves aligned on priorities and next steps.
Audit comparison

Quality audit vs. Startup quality audit

Both engagements share the same rigorous approach and report structure. The difference is depth, stakeholder coverage, and the type of organisation each is designed for.

Feature

Startup Quality Audit

Quality Audit

Target organization
Fast-growing startups
Mid-to-large companies
Duration
1 day (rapid)
5 days (can be tailored)
Stakeholders interviewed
Founders, tech leads, product
10+ roles across all functions
Security assessment
Overview only
Full security posture
Compliance & regulatory
Covered where relevant
Report appendices
Deep audit only
Always included
Incident pattern analysis
Historical review
Hiring recommendations
Light
Full hiring appendix
Stakeholder presentation
✔ Yes
✔ Yes
Continue the Work

The audit identifies what to fix.
These services help you fix it.

Most clients move into one or more of these after the audit, depending on what the findings surface.

Start the conversation

Fill out the form, and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Abstract background
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.